Yesterday's Wall Street Journal featured an article discussing the push back of NBC, CBS and Viacom to YouTube's approach to airing their video libraries. Additionally, Paul Vigna, a writer for Dow Jones, wrote an editorial declaring the networks safe, for now, because content will always be king.
This week's alliance between online video site Joost, and Viacom, is clearly aimed at setting up and reinforcing a competitive threat to Google's YouTube.
Did Google make a mistake buying the best-known piece of online video distribution real estate? Probably not.
Does Google, via YouTube, expect to air all the video content of the networks for free, or just shares of advertising revenues? Again, probably not.
Is Viacom going to get as much viewership for its content at Joost as it has, or would, at YouTube? Once again, probably not.
I don't think the issue here is whether YouTube will successfully deprive owners of existing video content of value for distributing that content directly online at a very popular site. I also think many pundits mistake YouTube as a joke, just full of some home movie producers.
The issue is whether YouTube successfully exemplifies the ability of one or two sites to become so valuable that they will rival the owners of content in importance.
In this regard, I disagree with Mr. Vigna. I don't believe the networks have much time to build any proprietary online distributions sites. YouTube is already pervasive. Why won't some creative production team approach YouTube directly for a distribution deal, and never even stop at the networks? Just release content on their own URL, and via YouTube. Or Joost. Perhaps one or two other sites.
What Mr. Vigna overlooks, a la AOL-TimeWarner, is that nobody has successfully owned distribution pipes and content. Either one may be managed successfully, for a time, to provide consistently superior total returns. But it's doubtful any company can provide both and have that performance.
Other content originators suspect a distributor who also produces content. Other distributors suspect a content provider who also owns distribution.
But, alone, the best-run, most creative distributor or content producer can easily dominate their business, and even fight its functional counterpart to an even revenue-sharing arrangement.
YouTube isn't an empty threat just yet. I think it will simply take a little time for the reality of the new, disintermediating online opportunities to fuel the move of content producers directly online. If so, then Google's bet on YouTube will look smart after all.
Thursday, February 22, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment