Yesterday's Wall Street Journal reported that, thanks to the severe credit crunch, current recession, and imminent control of both Houses of Congress and the Oval Office by Democrats, even mortgage lenders are bracing for some sort of "cram-down" legislation in the coming months.
The TARP bill originally had such a provision, but it was struck on the threat of veto.
In the past, all bankruptcy law modifications have carefully avoided violating residential mortgages on primary residences, since it was understood that introducing such risk into mortgage finance would lead to higher rates and probably downpayments, as well.
Welcome to the new world of mortgage finance. What investor will want to own mortgage-backed securities which are vulnerable to any small-town bankruptcy court judge's whims? It may not be a matter of higher rates or larger downpayments. Much of the mortgage-backed securities market might just vanish if such legislation passes.
Like it or not, the issue boils down to people being responsible for the obligations under contracts into which they freely entered.
Using cram-downs now, of course, rewards those people who engaged in excessive borrowing. And those who can now claim to have been coerced.
But the signal this sends for future contracts is very disturbing. Essentially, we are slowly evolving contract law into a scheme in which, if you don't get your desired result from the contract, somebody in a bankruptcy court will let you void the contract.
How can we, as a society, continue to function economically amidst such a legal vagueness in the most basic of all advanced economic systems?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Your statement, "In the past, all bankruptcy law modifications have carefully avoided violating residential mortgages on primary residences," is incorrect.
This was changed in the late 1970s, because it was argued that the rigorously regulated mortgage market did not need bankruptcy adjustments....
Seriously...Less than 30 years ago, the mortgage market was regulated, and you could get mortgages adjusted through bankruptcies...
BTW, you can still get those adjustments on rental property and vacation homes today.
Best estimate of the additional interest cost of the change is somewhere around 3/8%, btw.
I'm sorry, but I don't believe you are correct.
In fact, time and again, the articles I have read refer to primary residence mortgages never being vulnerable to local bankruptcy court jurisdiction.
You cite no sources for your contention, so I simply don't believe it's true. It could be just another fiction, like so many of Paul Krugman's contentions.
-CN
Here's an article refering to the historical treatment of mortgages in bankruptcy:
http://www.creditslips.org/creditslips/2007/11/mortgages-in-ba.html
-CN
Post a Comment